dc.contributor.author |
Stasinakis, AS |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Mamais, D |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Paraskevas, PA |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Lekkas, TD |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-03-01T01:18:57Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-03-01T01:18:57Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2003 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
1061-4303 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/15284 |
|
dc.subject |
Activated sludge |
en |
dc.subject |
Bacterial kinetics determination |
en |
dc.subject |
Batch methods |
en |
dc.subject |
Biomass growth |
en |
dc.subject |
Substrate-to-biomass ratio |
en |
dc.subject.classification |
Engineering, Environmental |
en |
dc.subject.classification |
Environmental Sciences |
en |
dc.subject.classification |
Limnology |
en |
dc.subject.classification |
Water Resources |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Batch reactors |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Growth rates |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Oxygen consumption |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Substrate-to-biomass ratios |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Bacteria |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Biomass |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Growth (materials) |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Oxidation |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Substrates |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Chemical reactors |
en |
dc.subject.other |
activated sludge |
en |
dc.subject.other |
batch separation |
en |
dc.subject.other |
biological treatment |
en |
dc.subject.other |
microorganism |
en |
dc.subject.other |
wastewater treatment |
en |
dc.subject.other |
activated sludge |
en |
dc.subject.other |
article |
en |
dc.subject.other |
bacterial growth |
en |
dc.subject.other |
bacterial kinetics |
en |
dc.subject.other |
batch reactor |
en |
dc.subject.other |
biomass support |
en |
dc.subject.other |
biosynthesis |
en |
dc.subject.other |
catabolism |
en |
dc.subject.other |
growth rate |
en |
dc.subject.other |
heterotrophy |
en |
dc.subject.other |
mathematical analysis |
en |
dc.subject.other |
oxygen consumption |
en |
dc.subject.other |
priority journal |
en |
dc.subject.other |
suspended particulate matter |
en |
dc.subject.other |
volatilization |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Bacteria (microorganisms) |
en |
dc.title |
Evaluation of different methods for the determination of maximum heterotrophic growth rates |
en |
heal.type |
journalArticle |
en |
heal.identifier.primary |
10.2175/106143003X141349 |
en |
heal.identifier.secondary |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/106143003X141349 |
en |
heal.language |
English |
en |
heal.publicationDate |
2003 |
en |
heal.abstract |
This work evaluated the most commonly used methods for determining maximum heterotrophic specific growth rates (mu(m)) in batch reactors. Parallel batch experiments were conducted under various initial substrate-to-biomass (S-o/X-o) ratios and values of the solids retention time (theta(c)). The maximum specific growth rate, mu(m) was determined simultaneously according to measurements of oxygen consumption (i.e., oxygen uptake rate, OUR) and volatile suspended solids (VSS) increase. The S-o/X-o ratio was found to significantly influence mu(m) values. Under high S-o/X-o ratios (= 20), fast-growing bacteria seemed to gain a competitive advantage resulting in higher mu(m) values than those obtained under low S-o/X-o ratios (= 1.5). The OUR-based estimate of mu(m) (mum((OUR))), under certain, circumstances, is differentiated from p. that is based on exponential bacterial growth (mu(m(vss))), and seems to be more a measure of substrate oxidation than a measure of bacterial growth. At high S-o/X-o ratio and low theta(c), mu(m(OUR)) was significantly higher than the mu(m(vss)), indicating that considerable uncoupling between anabolism and catabolism was occurring under these conditions. Batch experiments conducted at high S-o/X-o ratios seemed to be a more sensitive method for determining mu(m) values in the presence of an inhibitor than tests conducted at low S-o/X-o ratios. |
en |
heal.publisher |
WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION |
en |
heal.journalName |
Water Environment Research |
en |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.2175/106143003X141349 |
en |
dc.identifier.isi |
ISI:000220160000008 |
en |
dc.identifier.volume |
75 |
en |
dc.identifier.issue |
6 |
en |
dc.identifier.spage |
549 |
en |
dc.identifier.epage |
552 |
en |