dc.contributor.author | Rakopoulos, CD | en |
dc.contributor.author | Hountalas, DT | en |
dc.contributor.author | Rakopoulos, DC | en |
dc.contributor.author | Levendis, YA | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-03-01T01:20:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-03-01T01:20:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0887-0624 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/15811 | |
dc.subject.classification | Energy & Fuels | en |
dc.subject.classification | Engineering, Chemical | en |
dc.subject.other | Carbon monoxide | en |
dc.subject.other | Combustion | en |
dc.subject.other | Combustors | en |
dc.subject.other | Diesel engines | en |
dc.subject.other | Diesel fuels | en |
dc.subject.other | Environmental testing | en |
dc.subject.other | Gas emissions | en |
dc.subject.other | Hydrocarbons | en |
dc.subject.other | Kerosene | en |
dc.subject.other | Laboratory furnaces | en |
dc.subject.other | Nitrogen oxides | en |
dc.subject.other | Soot | en |
dc.subject.other | Direct injection | en |
dc.subject.other | Environmental evaluation | en |
dc.subject.other | Indirect injection | en |
dc.subject.other | Unburned hydrocarbons | en |
dc.subject.other | Fuel injection | en |
dc.title | Comparative environmental evaluation of JP-8 and diesel fuels burned in direct injection (DI) or indirect injection (IDI) diesel engines and in a laboratory furnace | en |
heal.type | journalArticle | en |
heal.identifier.primary | 10.1021/ef049931c | en |
heal.identifier.secondary | http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ef049931c | en |
heal.language | English | en |
heal.publicationDate | 2004 | en |
heal.abstract | In recent years, NATO and U.S. military forces have decided to implement a single fuel (JP-8) for all land-based military aircraft, vehicles, and equipment during war and peace times. This is referred to as the single fuel forward concept. However, possible environmental pollution problems have been identified in the process of implementing this single fuel concept. This work presents data on the operational and, especially, environmental evaluation of the JP-8 fuel that is burned in diesel engines and furnaces. The investigation is conducted in a comparative manner between the JP-8 fuel and the proverbial Diesel Oil No. 2, which is being substituted. The two fuels were burned under identical conditions in disparate types of combustors, including direct injection (DI) and indirect injection (IDI) diesel engines as well as a laminar-flow muffle furnace. The primary goal was to contrast the emissions of the two fuels, because JP-8 is a substitute for diesel oil in military applications, such as engines of ground vehicles and power generators, as well as other burners. Regulated emissions of CO, particulate matter (soot), oxides of nitrogen, and total unburned hydrocarbons have been examined. In the case of the combustion of the two fuels in the furnace, unregulated organic compounds have also been monitored. Moreover, the operational behaviors of the two fuels in the engines have been discussed. Results demonstrated that, for both fuels, the magnitude of the emissions, as well as the trends with operating conditions, were influenced by the type of combustor. However, the emissions from the two fuels, when burned in the same combustor, were comparable overall, both qualitatively and quantitatively. © 2004 American Chemical Society. | en |
heal.publisher | AMER CHEMICAL SOC | en |
heal.journalName | Energy and Fuels | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1021/ef049931c | en |
dc.identifier.isi | ISI:000223976800010 | en |
dc.identifier.volume | 18 | en |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | en |
dc.identifier.spage | 1302 | en |
dc.identifier.epage | 1308 | en |
Αρχεία | Μέγεθος | Μορφότυπο | Προβολή |
---|---|---|---|
Δεν υπάρχουν αρχεία που σχετίζονται με αυτό το τεκμήριο. |