dc.contributor.author | Bourithis, L | en |
dc.contributor.author | Papadimitriou, GD | en |
dc.contributor.author | Sideris, J | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-03-01T01:23:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-03-01T01:23:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0301-679X | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/17113 | |
dc.subject | AISI D2 | en |
dc.subject | AISI O1 | en |
dc.subject | Wear resistance | en |
dc.subject.classification | Engineering, Mechanical | en |
dc.subject.other | Abrasion | en |
dc.subject.other | Adhesion | en |
dc.subject.other | Hardness | en |
dc.subject.other | Microstructure | en |
dc.subject.other | Rubber products | en |
dc.subject.other | Wear of materials | en |
dc.subject.other | Wear resistance | en |
dc.subject.other | Wheels | en |
dc.subject.other | AISI D2 | en |
dc.subject.other | AISI O1 | en |
dc.subject.other | Two-body abrasion | en |
dc.subject.other | Wear properties | en |
dc.subject.other | Tool steel | en |
dc.title | Comparison of wear properties of tool steels AISI D2 and O1 with the same hardness | en |
heal.type | journalArticle | en |
heal.identifier.primary | 10.1016/j.triboint.2005.03.005 | en |
heal.identifier.secondary | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2005.03.005 | en |
heal.language | English | en |
heal.publicationDate | 2006 | en |
heal.abstract | Two commercial cold work tool steels, AISI D2 and O1, were heat treated in order to obtain the same hardness 700 HV (60 HRc) and were subsequently tested in three different modes of wear, namely in adhesion, three-body and two-body abrasion, by using pin-on-disk, dry sand/rubber wheel apparatus and pin abrasion on SiC, respectively. Even though AISI 01 and D2 steel are heat treated to the same hardness, they perform differently under the three modes of wear examined. The results show that the steel microstructures play the most important role in determining the wear properties. For relatively low sliding speeds AISI 01 steel performs up to 12 times better than AISI D2 steel in adhesive wear. For higher sliding speeds, however, this order is reversed due to oxidation taking place on the surface of the AISI D2 steel. The wear rate of both tool steels in three-body and two-body abrasion wear is proportional to the applied load. In three-body abrasive wear, AISI D2 exhibits a normalised wear rate about two times lower than the AISI 01 tool steel, and this is due to the presence of the plate-like hard carbides in its microstructure. Both tool steels perform 3-8 times better in three-body abrasive wear conditions than in two-body abrasive wear. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | en |
heal.publisher | ELSEVIER SCI LTD | en |
heal.journalName | Tribology International | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.triboint.2005.03.005 | en |
dc.identifier.isi | ISI:000236397700003 | en |
dc.identifier.volume | 39 | en |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | en |
dc.identifier.spage | 479 | en |
dc.identifier.epage | 489 | en |
Αρχεία | Μέγεθος | Μορφότυπο | Προβολή |
---|---|---|---|
Δεν υπάρχουν αρχεία που σχετίζονται με αυτό το τεκμήριο. |