A critical assessment of project management methods with respect to electronic government implementation challenges

Sarantis, D; Smithson, S; Charalabidis, Y; Askounis, D

dc.contributor.author	Sarantis, D	en
dc.contributor.author	Smithson, S	en
dc.contributor.author	Charalabidis, Y	en
dc.contributor.author	Askounis, D	en
dc.date.accessioned	2014-03-01T01:32:26Z
dc.date.available	2014-03-01T01:32:26Z
dc.date.issued	2010	en
dc.identifier.issn	1094-429X	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/20131
dc.subject	e-Government information systems	en
dc.subject	Information systems	en
dc.subject	Information technology project management	en
dc.subject	Public administration systems	en
dc.subject	Systematic approach	en
dc.subject	Systemic approach	en
dc.subject	Transformational government	en
dc.subject.classification	Management	en
dc.subject.other	INFORMATION-SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	en
dc.subject.other	PUBLIC-SECTOR	en
dc.subject.other	PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS	en
dc.subject.other	RED-TAPE	en
dc.subject.other	TECHNOLOGY	en
dc.subject.other	KNOWLEDGE	en
dc.subject.other	PROSPECTS	en
dc.subject.other	AGENCIES	en
dc.subject.other	ADOPTION	en
dc.subject.other	SERVICE	en
dc.title	A critical assessment of project management methods with respect to electronic government implementation challenges	en
heal.type	journalArticle	en
heal.identifier.primary	10.1007/s11213-009-9161-9	en
heal.identifier.secondary	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11213-009-9161-9	en
heal.language	English	en
heal.publicationDate	2010	en
heal.abstract	In taking forward both the Government Modernization and the Civil Service Reform agendas, renewed emphasis is being placed on project management approaches and techniques for achieving objectives more effectively and efficiently. After elaborating on specific electronic government project implementation challenges and giving an overview of state-of-the-art project management approaches, the paper examines the weaknesses of three commonly used methods in the light of the e-Government project challenges. The analysis identifies gaps in the methods, contributing to a better understanding of the factors that lead to success or failure. The resolution of such methodological limitations could lead to the enhancement of project management methods when applied to future projects. © 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.	en
heal.publisher	SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS	en
heal.journalName	Systemic Practice and Action Research	en
dc.identifier.doi	10.1007/s11213-009-9161-9	en
dc.identifier.isi	ISI:000280073800003	en
dc.identifier.volume	23	en
dc.identifier.issue	4	en
dc.identifier.spage	301	en
dc.identifier.epage	321	en