Alternative biological systems for the treatment of vinasse from wine

Vlyssides, A; Barampouti, EM; Mai, S; Stamatoglou, A; Tsimas, E

dc.contributor.author	Vlyssides, A	en
dc.contributor.author	Barampouti, EM	en
dc.contributor.author	Mai, S	en
dc.contributor.author	Stamatoglou, A	en
dc.contributor.author	Tsimas, E	en
dc.date.accessioned	2014-03-01T01:32:37Z
dc.date.available	2014-03-01T01:32:37Z
dc.date.issued	2010	en
dc.identifier.issn	0273-1223	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/20193
dc.subject	Anammox	en
dc.subject	Ferrous iron	en
dc.subject	Nitrogen reduction	en
dc.subject	UASB	en
dc.subject	Vinasse	en
dc.subject.classification	Engineering, Environmental	en
dc.subject.classification	Environmental Sciences	en
dc.subject.classification	Water Resources	en
dc.subject.other	ANAMMOX	en
dc.subject.other	Ferrous iron	en
dc.subject.other	Nitrogen reduction	en
dc.subject.other	UASB	en
dc.subject.other	Vinasses	en
dc.subject.other	Ammonium compounds	en
dc.subject.other	Biogas	en
dc.subject.other	Byproducts	en
dc.subject.other	Distilleries	en
dc.subject.other	Hydraulics	en
dc.subject.other	Hydrogen sulfide	en
dc.subject.other	Industrial water treatment	en
dc.subject.other	Nitrogen	en
dc.subject.other	Nitrogen removal	en
dc.subject.other	Oxygen	en
dc.subject.other	Sulfur	en
dc.subject.other	Sulfur determination	en
dc.subject.other	Wastewater	en
dc.subject.other	Wastewater treatment	en
dc.subject.other	Wine	en
dc.subject.other	Iron	en
dc.subject.other	ammonia	en
dc.subject.other	dinitrogen pentoxide	en
dc.subject.other	ferrous ion	en
dc.subject.other	ferrous sulfide	en
dc.subject.other	hydrogen sulfide	en
dc.subject.other	iron	en
dc.subject.other	nitrogen	en
dc.subject.other	oxygen	en
dc.subject.other	sulfur	en
dc.subject.other	biogas	en
dc.subject.other	chemical oxygen demand	en
dc.subject.other	environmental technology	en
dc.subject.other	industrial waste	en
dc.subject.other	iron	en
dc.subject.other	nitrogen	en
dc.subject.other	retention	en
dc.subject.other	sludge	en
dc.subject.other	sulfur	en
dc.subject.other	wastewater	en
dc.subject.other	anaerobic capacity	en
dc.subject.other	article	en
dc.subject.other	concentration (parameters)	en
dc.subject.other	hydraulic conductivity	en
dc.subject.other	nitrification	en
dc.subject.other	sludge	en
dc.subject.other	temperature	en
dc.subject.other	upflow reactor	en
dc.subject.other	vinasse	en
dc.subject.other	waste water management	en
dc.subject.other	wine	en
dc.subject.other	Biodegradation, Environmental	en
dc.subject.other	Industrial Waste	en
dc.subject.other	Waste Disposal, Fluid	en
dc.subject.other	Water Pollutants, Chemical	en
dc.subject.other	Wine	en
dc.title	Alternative biological systems for the treatment of vinasse from wine	en
heal.type	journalArticle	en
heal.identifier.primary	10.2166/wst.2010.647	en
heal.identifier.secondary	http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.647	en
heal.language	English	en
heal.publicationDate	2010	en
heal.abstract	This work studied alternative treatment schemes for the vinasse wastewater from wine distilleries aiming at overcoming the problems caused by the high nitrogen and sulfur concentrations. A plexiglas laboratory-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor of 20 L volume that was operated at 45°C and hydraulic retention time 1 d, was included in all the examined systems. System 1 was the conventional UASB reactor, system 2 was the UASB reactor supplemented with iron. System 3 consisted of the UASB reactor supplemented with iron and a CSTR reactor that operated under the following conditions: Diluted Oxygen 1.2 mg/L, Hydraulic Retention Time 1 d, pH 6.7 and Temperature 458C. System 3 aimed at converting ammonium directly to dinitrogen gas under anaerobic conditions but it needed to be preceeded by a first partial nitrification step. All systems had high COD efficiencies over 75%. Ferrous iron addition apart from enhancing the performance of systems 2 and 3, it was able to retain all sulphur content of the wastewater as ferrous sulfide stripping the biogas from hydrogen sulfide. System 3 also managed to meet its goal, since it achieved an 86% nitrogen reduction. Conclusively, system 3 seems to be a very promising environmental technology for the treatment of distillery and winery byproducts, as well as industrial wastewater with high sulfur and nitrogen content. © IWA Publishing 2010.	en
heal.publisher	IWA PUBLISHING	en
heal.journalName	Water Science and Technology	en
dc.identifier.doi	10.2166/wst.2010.647	en
dc.identifier.isi	ISI:000285237600021	en
dc.identifier.volume	62	en
dc.identifier.issue	12	en
dc.identifier.spage	2899	en
dc.identifier.epage	2904	en