dc.contributor.author |
Anastasopoulos, PCh |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Florax, RJGM |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Labi, S |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Karlaftis, MG |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-03-01T01:33:03Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-03-01T01:33:03Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2010 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0965-8564 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/20296 |
|
dc.subject |
Contract management |
en |
dc.subject |
Cost savings |
en |
dc.subject |
Infrastructure maintenance |
en |
dc.subject |
Innovative outsourcing |
en |
dc.subject |
Rehabilitation |
en |
dc.subject |
Spatial econometric analysis |
en |
dc.subject.classification |
Transportation |
en |
dc.subject.classification |
Transportation Science & Technology |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Average cost |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Contract costs |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Contract management |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Cost saving |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Cost savings |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Design build |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Econometric analysis |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Econometric modeling |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Expected costs |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Explanatory variables |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Highway agencies |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Highway contracts |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Highway maintenance |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Infrastructure maintenance |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Marginal effects |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Project delivery |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Spatial effect |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Costs |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Highway administration |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Maintenance |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Outsourcing |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Patient rehabilitation |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Privatization |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Cost benefit analysis |
en |
dc.subject.other |
estimation method |
en |
dc.subject.other |
innovation |
en |
dc.subject.other |
maintenance |
en |
dc.subject.other |
methodology |
en |
dc.subject.other |
project management |
en |
dc.subject.other |
transportation infrastructure |
en |
dc.title |
Contracting in highway maintenance and rehabilitation: Are spatial effects important? |
en |
heal.type |
journalArticle |
en |
heal.identifier.primary |
10.1016/j.tra.2009.12.002 |
en |
heal.identifier.secondary |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2009.12.002 |
en |
heal.language |
English |
en |
heal.publicationDate |
2010 |
en |
heal.abstract |
Highway agencies around the world strive to improve practices for infrastructure maintenance and rehabilitation, using project delivery policies that range from total 'in-house' responsibility to complete privatization, with a number of flexible contracting policies such as performance-based contracting, variants of design-build-maintain, and lane rentals among others between these two extremes. In this paper, we present a methodology that duly accounts for underlying spatial effects and estimates the expected cost savings of innovative contracting policies for highway maintenance and rehabilitation relative to in-house execution of these activities. Spatial econometric modeling is used to analyze highway contract data from 49 countries. We also investigate the marginal effects of key explanatory variables on contract cost savings using spatial multipliers. Our findings show that there are significant relationships between cost savings and contract characteristics, and that there is an apparent direct relationship between the average cost savings of contracts in a country and contract average cost savings and contract sizes in neighboring countries. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
en |
heal.publisher |
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD |
en |
heal.journalName |
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice |
en |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1016/j.tra.2009.12.002 |
en |
dc.identifier.isi |
ISI:000275992800002 |
en |
dc.identifier.volume |
44 |
en |
dc.identifier.issue |
3 |
en |
dc.identifier.spage |
136 |
en |
dc.identifier.epage |
146 |
en |