dc.contributor.author |
Vasilopoulou, T |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Tzika, F |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Koster-Ammerlaan, MJJ |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Stamatelatos, IE |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-03-01T01:35:54Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-03-01T01:35:54Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2011 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0236-5731 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/21246 |
|
dc.subject |
Gamma Spectrometry |
en |
dc.subject |
Large sample |
en |
dc.subject |
Neutron activation analysis |
en |
dc.subject.classification |
Chemistry, Analytical |
en |
dc.subject.classification |
Chemistry, Inorganic & Nuclear |
en |
dc.subject.classification |
Nuclear Science & Technology |
en |
dc.subject.other |
arsenic 76 |
en |
dc.subject.other |
copper 64 |
en |
dc.subject.other |
europium 152 |
en |
dc.subject.other |
gallium 72 |
en |
dc.subject.other |
isotope |
en |
dc.subject.other |
lanthanum 140 |
en |
dc.subject.other |
potassium 42 |
en |
dc.subject.other |
samarium 153 |
en |
dc.subject.other |
scandium 46 |
en |
dc.subject.other |
tungsten 187 |
en |
dc.subject.other |
unclassified drug |
en |
dc.subject.other |
zinc 69 |
en |
dc.subject.other |
article |
en |
dc.subject.other |
calibration |
en |
dc.subject.other |
chemical analysis |
en |
dc.subject.other |
controlled study |
en |
dc.subject.other |
gamma radiation |
en |
dc.subject.other |
gamma spectrometry |
en |
dc.subject.other |
instrumental neutron activation analysis |
en |
dc.subject.other |
irradiation |
en |
dc.subject.other |
large sample neutron activation analysis |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Monte Carlo method |
en |
dc.subject.other |
neutron activation analysis |
en |
dc.title |
Large sample neutron activation analysis of a reference inhomogeneous sample |
en |
heal.type |
journalArticle |
en |
heal.identifier.primary |
10.1007/s10967-011-1130-y |
en |
heal.identifier.secondary |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10967-011-1130-y |
en |
heal.language |
English |
en |
heal.publicationDate |
2011 |
en |
heal.abstract |
A benchmark experiment was performed for Neutron Activation Analysis (NAA) of a large inhomogeneous sample. The reference sample was developed in-house and consisted of SiO2 matrix and an Al-Zn alloy "" inhomogeneity"" body. Monte Carlo simulations were employed to derive appropriate correction factors for neutron self-shielding during irradiation as well as self-attenuation of gamma rays and sample geometry during counting. The large sample neutron activation analysis (LSNAA) results were compared against reference values and the trueness of the technique was evaluated. An agreement within ±10% was observed between LSNAA and reference elemental mass values, for all matrix and inhomogeneity elements except Samarium, provided that the inhomogeneity body was fully simulated. However, in cases that the inhomogeneity was treated as not known, the results showed a reasonable agreement for most matrix elements, while large discrepancies were observed for the inhomogeneity elements. This study provided a quantification of the uncertainties associated with inhomogeneity in large sample analysis and contributed to the identification of the needs for future development of LSNAA facilities for analysis of inhomogeneous samples. © 2011 Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary. |
en |
heal.publisher |
SPRINGER |
en |
heal.journalName |
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry |
en |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1007/s10967-011-1130-y |
en |
dc.identifier.isi |
ISI:000293029200011 |
en |
dc.identifier.volume |
289 |
en |
dc.identifier.issue |
3 |
en |
dc.identifier.spage |
731 |
en |
dc.identifier.epage |
737 |
en |