dc.contributor.author |
Gelagoti, F |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Kourkoulis, R |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Anastasopoulos, I |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Gazetas, G |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-03-01T01:37:36Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-03-01T01:37:36Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2012 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0267-7261 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/21569 |
|
dc.subject.classification |
Engineering, Geological |
en |
dc.subject.classification |
Geosciences, Multidisciplinary |
en |
dc.subject.other |
A-frames |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Analytical solutions |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Design approaches |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Displacement capacity |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Foundation design |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Frame structure |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Horizontal displacements |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Illustrative examples |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Isolated footings |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Key factors |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Non-linear FE |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Nonlinear dynamic time-history analysis |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Rigid body |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Seismic demands |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Seismic load |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Seismic Performance |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Simplified procedure |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Spectral displacement |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Design |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Estimation |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Numerical analysis |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Seismology |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Structural frames |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Seismic design |
en |
dc.subject.other |
collapse |
en |
dc.subject.other |
finite element method |
en |
dc.subject.other |
footing |
en |
dc.subject.other |
mathematical analysis |
en |
dc.subject.other |
seismic design |
en |
dc.subject.other |
structural analysis |
en |
dc.subject.other |
structural component |
en |
dc.subject.other |
toppling |
en |
dc.title |
Rocking-isolated frame structures: Margins of safety against toppling collapse and simplified design approach |
en |
heal.type |
journalArticle |
en |
heal.identifier.primary |
10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.08.008 |
en |
heal.identifier.secondary |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.08.008 |
en |
heal.language |
English |
en |
heal.publicationDate |
2012 |
en |
heal.abstract |
This paper aims to explore the limitations associated with the design of "rocking-isolated" frame structures. According to this emerging seismic design concept, instead of over-designing the isolated footings of a frame (as entrenched in current capacity-design principles), the latter are under-designed with the intention to limit the seismic loads transmitted to the superstructure. An idealized 2-storey frame is utilized as an illustrative example, to investigate the key factors affecting foundation design. Nonlinear FE analysis is employed to study the seismic performance of the rocking-isolated frame. After investigating the margins of safety against toppling collapse, a simplified procedure is developed to estimate the minimum acceptable footing width B-min, without recourse to sophisticated (and time consuming) numerical analyses. It is shown that adequate margins of safety against toppling collapse may be achieved, if the toppling displacement capacity of the frame delta(topl), (i.e. the maximum horizontal displacement that does not provoke toppling) is sufficiently larger than the seismic demand delta(dem). With respect to the capacity, the use of an appropriate "equivalent" rigid-body is suggested, and shown to yield a conservative estimate of delta(topl). The demand is estimated on the basis of the displacement spectrum, and the peak spectral displacement SDmax a is proposed as a conservative measure of delta(dem). The validity and limitations of such approximation are investigated for a rigid-block on rigid-base, utilizing rigorous analytical solutions from the bibliography; and for the frame structure on nonlinear soil, by conducting comprehensive nonlinear dynamic time history analyses. In all cases examined, the simplified SDmax approach is shown to yield reasonably conservative estimates. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
en |
heal.publisher |
ELSEVIER SCI LTD |
en |
heal.journalName |
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering |
en |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.08.008 |
en |
dc.identifier.isi |
ISI:000297449200007 |
en |
dc.identifier.volume |
32 |
en |
dc.identifier.issue |
1 |
en |
dc.identifier.spage |
87 |
en |
dc.identifier.epage |
102 |
en |