Quantum-mechanical versus semiclassical calculations of dc-field-induced tunneling rates of Li 1s22s2S, 1s22p2P0, and 1s23d2D

Themelis, SI; Nicolaides, CA

dc.contributor.author	Themelis, SI	en
dc.contributor.author	Nicolaides, CA	en
dc.date.accessioned	2014-03-01T01:48:42Z
dc.date.available	2014-03-01T01:48:42Z
dc.date.issued	1999	en
dc.identifier.issn	10502947	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/25571
dc.subject.other	Atomic physics	en
dc.subject.other	Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions	en
dc.subject.other	Lithium	en
dc.subject.other	Mathematical models	en
dc.subject.other	Matrix algebra	en
dc.subject.other	Quantum theory	en
dc.subject.other	Electric dipole	en
dc.subject.other	Field-induced tunneling rates	en
dc.subject.other	One-electron semiclassical models	en
dc.subject.other	Quantum-mechanical theory	en
dc.subject.other	Electron tunneling	en
dc.title	Quantum-mechanical versus semiclassical calculations of dc-field-induced tunneling rates of Li 1s22s2S, 1s22p2P0, and 1s23d2D	en
heal.type	journalArticle	en
heal.identifier.primary	10.1103/PhysRevA.59.2500	en
heal.identifier.secondary	http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.59.2500	en
heal.identifier.secondary	2500	en
heal.publicationDate	1999	en
heal.abstract	The dc-field-induced tunneling rates for Li 1s22s2S, 1s22p2P0, and 1s23d2D states were computed from our previously published nonperturbative, many-electron quantum-mechanical theory. The results are compared to those obtained using formulas derived from one-electron semiclassical models. For small values of the field strength, the results exhibit the same behavior. However, quantitative as well as qualitative differences are observed for strong fields. © 1999 The American Physical Society.	en
heal.journalName	Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics	en
dc.identifier.doi	10.1103/PhysRevA.59.2500	en
dc.identifier.volume	59	en
dc.identifier.issue	3	en
dc.identifier.spage	2500	en
dc.identifier.epage	2503	en