dc.contributor.author |
Exel, J |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Rienstra, S |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Gommers, M |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Pearman, A |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Tsamboulas, D |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-03-01T01:51:32Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-03-01T01:51:32Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2002 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/26345 |
|
dc.subject |
Integrated Approach |
en |
dc.subject |
Network Effect |
en |
dc.subject |
Transport Policy |
en |
dc.subject |
Transportation Networks |
en |
dc.subject |
Value Added |
en |
dc.subject |
European Union |
en |
dc.subject |
Member States |
en |
dc.title |
EU involvement in TEN development: network effects and European value added |
en |
heal.type |
journalArticle |
en |
heal.identifier.primary |
10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00016-1 |
en |
heal.identifier.secondary |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00016-1 |
en |
heal.publicationDate |
2002 |
en |
heal.abstract |
The recent White Paper emphasises once more that the Trans-European transport network (TEN) is a key element in European Union (EU) policy, yet that its realisation is jeopardised by the lack of an integrated approach during evaluation and funding of cross-border infrastructure. Despite the intervention of the EU in conceptualising the TEN, subsidiarity and continued use of conventional evaluation procedures |
en |
heal.journalName |
Transport Policy |
en |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00016-1 |
en |