Socio-technical Systems Analysis: Which approach should be followed?

Nathanael, D; Marmaras, N; Papantoniou, B; Zarboutis, N

dc.contributor.author	Nathanael, D	en
dc.contributor.author	Marmaras, N	en
dc.contributor.author	Papantoniou, B	en
dc.contributor.author	Zarboutis, N	en
dc.date.accessioned	2014-03-01T01:51:45Z
dc.date.available	2014-03-01T01:51:45Z
dc.date.issued	2002	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/26419
dc.relation.uri	http://simor.mech.ntua.gr/ergou/Docs/Nathanael&Marmaras&Papantoniou&Zarboutis_ECCE11.pdf	en
dc.relation.uri	http://simor.ntua.gr/ErgoU/Docs/Nathanael&Marmaras&Papantoniou&Zarboutis_ECCE11.pdf	en
dc.subject	Activity Theory	en
dc.subject	Analysis and Design	en
dc.subject	Cognitive Systems Engineering	en
dc.subject	Distributed Cognition	en
dc.subject	Frame of Reference	en
dc.subject	socio-technical system	en
dc.title	Socio-technical Systems Analysis: Which approach should be followed?	en
heal.type	journalArticle	en
heal.publicationDate	2002	en
heal.abstract	The aim of the present paper is to contribute to the de- bate in the cognitive ergonomics community as for the adequacy of different approaches for the analysis of socio-technical systems in view of designing artifacts facilitating human work. Using a taxonomy of socio- technical systems as frame of reference, the theoretical origins and the main application domains of three	en