Moving Without Being Where You’re Not; A Non-Bivalent Way

Antonopoulos, C

dc.contributor.author	Antonopoulos, C	en
dc.date.accessioned	2014-03-01T01:53:27Z
dc.date.available	2014-03-01T01:53:27Z
dc.date.issued	2004	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/27018
dc.subject	Moving Object	en
dc.subject	Quantum Theory	en
dc.title	Moving Without Being Where You’re Not; A Non-Bivalent Way	en
heal.type	journalArticle	en
heal.identifier.primary	10.1007/s10838-004-2095-0	en
heal.identifier.secondary	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10838-004-2095-0	en
heal.publicationDate	2004	en
heal.abstract	The classical response to Zeno’s paradoxes goes like this: ‘Motion cannot properly be defined within an instant. Only over a period’ (Vlastos.) I show that this ob-jection is exactly what it takes for Zeno to be right. If motion cannot be defined at an instant, even though the object is always moving at that instant, motion cannot be defined at	en
heal.journalName	Journal for General Philosophy of Science	en
dc.identifier.doi	10.1007/s10838-004-2095-0	en