dc.contributor.author |
Lalountas, M |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Ballas, KD |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Michalakis, A |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Psarras, K |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Asteriou, C |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Giakoustidis, DE |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Nikolaidou, C |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Venizelos, I |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Pavlidis, TE |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Sakantamis, AK |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-03-01T02:12:03Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-03-01T02:12:03Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2012 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
00071323 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/29992 |
|
dc.subject.other |
atorvastatin |
en |
dc.subject.other |
biomaterial |
en |
dc.subject.other |
carboxymethylcellulose |
en |
dc.subject.other |
heptanoic acid derivative |
en |
dc.subject.other |
hyaluronic acid |
en |
dc.subject.other |
hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor |
en |
dc.subject.other |
pyrrole derivative |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Seprafilm |
en |
dc.subject.other |
animal |
en |
dc.subject.other |
article |
en |
dc.subject.other |
fibrosis |
en |
dc.subject.other |
male |
en |
dc.subject.other |
pathology |
en |
dc.subject.other |
randomization |
en |
dc.subject.other |
rat |
en |
dc.subject.other |
tissue adhesion |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Wistar rat |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Animals |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Biocompatible Materials |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Fibrosis |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Heptanoic Acids |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Hyaluronic Acid |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Male |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Pyrroles |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Random Allocation |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Rats |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Rats, Wistar |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Tissue Adhesions |
en |
dc.title |
Postoperative adhesion prevention using a statin-containing cellulose film in an experimental model |
en |
heal.type |
journalArticle |
en |
heal.identifier.primary |
10.1002/bjs.7817 |
en |
heal.identifier.secondary |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7817 |
en |
heal.publicationDate |
2012 |
en |
heal.abstract |
Background: Intraperitoneal adhesions are a common problem in abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Statofilm, a novel antiadhesive film based on cross-linked carboxymethylcellulose and atorvastatin, with that of sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose (Seprafilm®) in the prevention of postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions in rats. Methods: One hundred male Wistar rats underwent a laparotomy and adhesions were induced by caecal abrasion. The animals were allocated to five groups: a control group with no adhesion barrier, Seprafilm® group, placebo group with a film containing carboxymethylcellulose without atorvastatin, and low- and high-dose groups with films containing carboxymethylcellulose and atorvastatin 0·125 and 1 mg per kg bodyweight respectively. Adhesions were classified by two independent surgeons 2 weeks after surgery. Caecal biopsies were obtained for histological evaluation of fibrosis, inflammation and vascular proliferation. Results: All antiadhesive film groups (Seprafilm®, placebo, low-dose and high-dose) had statistically significant adhesion reduction compared with the control group (P < 0·001, P = 0·015, P < 0·001 and P < 0·001 respectively). The low-dose Statofilm was superior to Seprafilm® in terms of adhesion prevention (P = 0·001). Adhesions were present in three-quarters of rats in the Seprafilm® group, but only one-quarter in the low-dose Statofilm group. Conclusion: The data suggest that the newly developed adhesion barrier Statofilm has better results than Seprafilm® in preventing postoperative adhesions in rats. A low-dose atorvastatin-containing film, such as Statofilm, could be evaluated for future clinical application. Copyright © 2012 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
en |
heal.journalName |
British Journal of Surgery |
en |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1002/bjs.7817 |
en |
dc.identifier.volume |
99 |
en |
dc.identifier.issue |
3 |
en |
dc.identifier.spage |
423 |
en |
dc.identifier.epage |
429 |
en |