Identifying the components of modeling through protocol analysis

Steif, PS; Pantazidou, M

dc.contributor.author	Steif, PS	en
dc.contributor.author	Pantazidou, M	en
dc.date.accessioned	2014-03-01T02:42:48Z
dc.date.available	2014-03-01T02:42:48Z
dc.date.issued	2004	en
dc.identifier.issn	01901052	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/31087
dc.relation.uri	http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-5444249215&partnerID=40&md5=8dd5de6b7d649440ba8e91df24ed45c1	en
dc.relation.uri	http://www.me.cmu.edu/steif/papers/asee_modeling_paper.pdf	en
dc.subject	Protocol Analysis	en
dc.subject.other	Instructors	en
dc.subject.other	Interviews	en
dc.subject.other	Protocol analysis	en
dc.subject.other	Researchers	en
dc.subject.other	Cognitive systems	en
dc.subject.other	Problem solving	en
dc.subject.other	Process engineering	en
dc.subject.other	Research	en
dc.subject.other	Statistics	en
dc.subject.other	Students	en
dc.subject.other	Teaching	en
dc.subject.other	Engineering education	en
dc.title	Identifying the components of modeling through protocol analysis	en
heal.type	conferenceItem	en
heal.publicationDate	2004	en
heal.abstract	Two alternative approaches for identifying the components of modeling of physical systems are discussed. The prescriptive approach relies on teaching experience and domain expertise, while the normative approach is based on subject interviews and protocol analysis. A framework for the modeling process, consisting of ten components, is developed using primarily the normative approach. It is concluded that teaching of modeling may benefit from explicitly addressing these components.	en
heal.journalName	ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings	en
dc.identifier.spage	6669	en
dc.identifier.epage	6675	en