Triple play service simulation and packet scheduling performance evaluation

Sotiropoulos, GP; Styliaras, DK; Kosmatos, EA; Papagianni, CA; Tselikas, ND; Venieris, IS

dc.contributor.author	Sotiropoulos, GP	en
dc.contributor.author	Styliaras, DK	en
dc.contributor.author	Kosmatos, EA	en
dc.contributor.author	Papagianni, CA	en
dc.contributor.author	Tselikas, ND	en
dc.contributor.author	Venieris, IS	en
dc.date.accessioned	2014-03-01T02:44:21Z
dc.date.available	2014-03-01T02:44:21Z
dc.date.issued	2006	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/31765
dc.subject	Available Bandwidth	en
dc.subject	Content Delivery	en
dc.subject	differentiated services diffserv	en
dc.subject	Integrated Services	en
dc.subject	Low Latency	en
dc.subject	Packet Scheduling	en
dc.subject	Performance Evaluation	en
dc.subject	Quality of Service	en
dc.subject	Satisfiability	en
dc.subject	Weighted Fair Queuing	en
dc.subject.other	Computer simulation	en
dc.subject.other	Image coding	en
dc.subject.other	Multimedia services	en
dc.subject.other	Network architecture	en
dc.subject.other	Quality of service	en
dc.subject.other	Scheduling algorithms	en
dc.subject.other	Differentiated Service	en
dc.subject.other	Packet scheduling	en
dc.subject.other	Performance evaluation	en
dc.subject.other	Triple Play technology	en
dc.subject.other	Packet networks	en
dc.title	Triple play service simulation and packet scheduling performance evaluation	en
heal.type	conferenceItem	en
heal.identifier.primary	10.1109/ICDT.2006.75	en
heal.identifier.secondary	http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICDT.2006.75	en
heal.identifier.secondary	1698501	en
heal.publicationDate	2006	en
heal.abstract	Triple Play technology is nowadays considered as an indisputable trend. The Differentiated Service (DiffServ) architecture is preferred over ""Hard Quality of Service"" (QoS) Integrated Service (IntServ) architecture. Moreover it applies perfectly to triple play, as it satisfies differing QoS requirements. In addition, latest developments in the area of video and audio encoding impose new challenges in content delivery systems. The combination of these three technologies is expected to raise additional QoS related issues. Problems such as full exploitation of available bandwidth and providing adequate QoS to subscribed users by meeting the requirements of all three supported services (video, voice and data) must be addressed. Within this context, the particular paper examines the performance of common packet scheduling techniques used in a DiffServ triple play architecture. The performance of Priority Queuing (PQ), Weight Fair Queuing (WFQ) and Weight Fair Low Latency Queuing (WFQ-LLQ) schemes is assessed, in order to find the most appropriate solution for the underlying network. The evaluation of the schedulers is based on simulations designed upon real triple play networks, while trace files are used for the simulation of video flows. © IEEE.	en
heal.journalName	International Conference on Digital Telecommunications 2006, ICDT'06	en
dc.identifier.doi	10.1109/ICDT.2006.75	en