dc.contributor.author |
Economakos, G |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Xydis, S |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-03-01T02:45:04Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-03-01T02:45:04Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2008 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/32125 |
|
dc.subject |
Critical Path |
en |
dc.subject |
High Level Synthesis |
en |
dc.subject |
reconfigurable computing |
en |
dc.subject |
run time reconfigurable |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Benchmarking |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Scheduling |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Systems analysis |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Critical Paths |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Different modes |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Dsp benchmarks |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Hardware and softwares |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Implementation architectures |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Maximum performances |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Postprocessing stages |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Reconfigurable |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Reconfiguration overheads |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Architectural design |
en |
dc.title |
A scheduling postprocessor to exploit morphable RTL components during high-level synthesis |
en |
heal.type |
conferenceItem |
en |
heal.identifier.primary |
10.1109/DSD.2008.85 |
en |
heal.identifier.secondary |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/DSD.2008.85 |
en |
heal.identifier.secondary |
4669277 |
en |
heal.publicationDate |
2008 |
en |
heal.abstract |
Reconfigurable computing is intended to fill the gap between hardware and software, achieving potentially much higher performance than software, while maintaining a higher level of flexibility than hardware. In this paper, a special type of course grain reconfigurable RTL components, called morphable multipliers, are used as parts of the implementation architecture, during a high-level synthesis scheduling postprocessing stage. With this approach, components that would remain idle in certain control steps are working full-time in two different modes, without any reconfiguration overhead applied to the critical path of the application. The results obtained with different DSP benchmarks show a maximum performance gain of 60% with an average 25% area gain. © 2008 IEEE. |
en |
heal.journalName |
Proceedings - 11th EUROMICRO Conference on Digital System Design Architectures, Methods and Tools, DSD 2008 |
en |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1109/DSD.2008.85 |
en |
dc.identifier.spage |
494 |
en |
dc.identifier.epage |
502 |
en |