dc.contributor.author |
Panagis, P |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Stergiopoulos, F |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Marabeas, P |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Manias, S |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-03-01T02:45:11Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-03-01T02:45:11Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2008 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
02759306 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/32193 |
|
dc.subject |
Multilevel Inverter |
en |
dc.subject |
Neutral Point Clamped |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Chlorine compounds |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Electric currents |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Power electronics |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Power quality |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Topology |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Circuitry complexity |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Comparison results |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Diode-clamped multilevel inverter |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Flying capacitor multilevel inverter |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Harmonic components |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Implementation costs |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Multi-level inverters |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Neutral points |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Output voltages |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Peak values |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Simulation results |
en |
dc.subject.other |
State of the arts |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Electric inverters |
en |
dc.title |
Comparison of state of the art multilevel inverters |
en |
heal.type |
conferenceItem |
en |
heal.identifier.primary |
10.1109/PESC.2008.4592633 |
en |
heal.identifier.secondary |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PESC.2008.4592633 |
en |
heal.identifier.secondary |
4592633 |
en |
heal.publicationDate |
2008 |
en |
heal.abstract |
In this paper, a comparison between existing state of the art multilevel inverter topologies is performed. The topologies examined are the Neutral Point Clamp Multilevel inverter (NPCMLI) or Diode-Clamped Multilevel Inverter (DCMLI), the Flying Capacitor Multilevel Inverter (FCMLI) and the Cascaded Cell Multilevel Inverter (CCMLI). The comparison of these inverters is based on the criteria of output voltage quality (Peak value of the fundamental and dominant harmonic components and THD), power circuitry complexity, and implementation cost. The comparison results are based on theoretical results verified by detailed simulation results. ©2008 IEEE. |
en |
heal.journalName |
PESC Record - IEEE Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference |
en |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1109/PESC.2008.4592633 |
en |
dc.identifier.spage |
4296 |
en |
dc.identifier.epage |
4301 |
en |