dc.contributor.author |
Kanellakis, P |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Papadimitriou, C |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-03-01T02:47:33Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-03-01T02:47:33Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
1982 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/33224 |
|
dc.subject |
Concurrency Control |
en |
dc.subject |
Distributed Database |
en |
dc.title |
Is distributed locking harder? |
en |
heal.type |
conferenceItem |
en |
heal.identifier.primary |
10.1145/588111.588129 |
en |
heal.identifier.secondary |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/588111.588129 |
en |
heal.publicationDate |
1982 |
en |
heal.abstract |
We examine the problem of determining whether a set of locked transactions, accessing a distributed database, is guaranteed to produce only serializable schedules. For a pair of transactions we prove that this concurrency control problem (which is polynomially solvable for centralized databases) is in general coNP-complete. We employ a new graph-theoretic technique and provide an efficient test for the special |
en |
heal.journalName |
Symposium on Principles of Database Systems |
en |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1145/588111.588129 |
en |