dc.contributor.author |
Todoran, E |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Papaspyrou, N |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-03-01T02:48:57Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-03-01T02:48:57Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2000 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/34150 |
|
dc.subject |
denotational semantic |
en |
dc.subject |
Logic Programs |
en |
dc.subject |
Parallel Composition |
en |
dc.subject |
Parallel Logic Programming |
en |
dc.title |
Continuations for parallel logic programming |
en |
heal.type |
conferenceItem |
en |
heal.identifier.primary |
10.1145/351268.351297 |
en |
heal.identifier.secondary |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/351268.351297 |
en |
heal.publicationDate |
2000 |
en |
heal.abstract |
This paper gives denotational models for three logic programminglanguages of progressive complexity, adopting the\logic programming without logic" approach. The rst languageis the control ow kernel of sequential Prolog, featuringsequential composition and backtracking. A committedchoiceconcurrent logic language with parallel composition(parallel AND) and don't care nondeterminism is studiednext. The third language is the core of Warren's basic Andorramodel, combining parallel... |
en |
heal.journalName |
Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming |
en |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1145/351268.351297 |
en |