dc.contributor.author |
Economou, D |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Mavroidis, C |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Antoniadis, I |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-03-01T02:49:13Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-03-01T02:49:13Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2002 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
07431619 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/34417 |
|
dc.relation.uri |
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0036346271&partnerID=40&md5=d2dc626c943c76886c300a79fc60a4d5 |
en |
dc.subject |
Digital filters |
en |
dc.subject |
Input preconditioning |
en |
dc.subject |
Input shaping |
en |
dc.subject |
Vibration suppression |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Computer simulation |
en |
dc.subject.other |
FIR filters |
en |
dc.subject.other |
IIR filters |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Least squares approximations |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Optimal control systems |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Parameter estimation |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Robustness (control systems) |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Time varying control systems |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Vibration control |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Chebyshev window |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Input preconditioning |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Input shaping |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Parks-McClellan filter |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Vibration suppression |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Control system analysis |
en |
dc.title |
Comparison of filter types used for command preconditioning in vibration suppression applications |
en |
heal.type |
conferenceItem |
en |
heal.publicationDate |
2002 |
en |
heal.abstract |
A vast variety of filter types were proven to be effective and efficient for robust residual vibration suppression, when they are applied for input or command preconditioning. These filter types include a class of specifically designed notch Finite Impulse Response (FIR) filters -known as ""input shapers""-, conventional low-pass FIR filters and conventional low-pass Infinite Impulse Response (IIR) filters. Although all these filters possess good vibration suppression properties, they present different performance characteristics. A comparison of these filters is attempted in this paper, in order to evaluate the advantages and the drawbacks of each filter type. It is concluded that certain conventional FIR filters (the filter designed using a Chebyshev window, the Parks-McClellan filter and the Constrained Least Squares filter) and a specific IIR filter (the Thiran's filter) are the best performing filter types, especially when they are used to suppress vibration of systems with multiple modes or when they are used to suppress vibration of time-varying systems. |
en |
heal.journalName |
Proceedings of the American Control Conference |
en |
dc.identifier.volume |
3 |
en |
dc.identifier.spage |
2273 |
en |
dc.identifier.epage |
2278 |
en |