dc.contributor.author |
Pnevmatikos, N |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Gantes, C |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-03-01T02:49:42Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-03-01T02:49:42Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2004 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/34695 |
|
dc.relation.uri |
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84857463448&partnerID=40&md5=b78ae46b833405ecb605f70d0f901df2 |
en |
dc.subject |
Classical control |
en |
dc.subject |
Closed-loop eigenvalues |
en |
dc.subject |
Control demands |
en |
dc.subject |
Control of structure |
en |
dc.subject |
Controlled system |
en |
dc.subject |
Damping ratio |
en |
dc.subject |
Earthquake action |
en |
dc.subject |
Earthquake frequency |
en |
dc.subject |
Eigen frequencies |
en |
dc.subject |
Eigenvalues |
en |
dc.subject |
Elastic analysis |
en |
dc.subject |
Feedback matrices |
en |
dc.subject |
Frequency contents |
en |
dc.subject |
Main frequency |
en |
dc.subject |
Numerical example |
en |
dc.subject |
Optimum number |
en |
dc.subject |
Pole placement |
en |
dc.subject |
Pole placement algorithms |
en |
dc.subject |
Real time |
en |
dc.subject |
Structural behaviors |
en |
dc.subject |
Algorithms |
en |
dc.subject |
Civil engineering |
en |
dc.subject |
Dynamic analysis |
en |
dc.subject |
Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions |
en |
dc.subject |
Poles |
en |
dc.subject |
Poles and zeros |
en |
dc.subject |
Spectrum analyzers |
en |
dc.subject |
Earthquakes |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Classical control |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Closed-loop eigenvalues |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Control demands |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Control of structure |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Controlled system |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Damping ratio |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Earthquake action |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Earthquake frequency |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Eigen frequencies |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Eigenvalues |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Elastic analysis |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Feedback matrices |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Frequency contents |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Main frequency |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Numerical example |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Optimum number |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Pole placement |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Pole placement algorithms |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Real time |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Structural behaviors |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Algorithms |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Civil engineering |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Dynamic analysis |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Poles |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Poles and zeros |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Spectrum analyzers |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Earthquakes |
en |
dc.title |
Accounting for frequency content of earthquakes in the control of structures |
en |
heal.type |
conferenceItem |
en |
heal.publicationDate |
2004 |
en |
heal.abstract |
The objective of this work is the control of structures by means of the pole placement algorithm, in order to improve their response against earthquake actions. To that effect, the frequency content of the incoming earthquake signal is used. The pole placement is a well-known, classical control algorithm that estimates the feedback matrix so that the system will have poles (eigenvalues) that are pre-decided by the designer. Successful application of the algorithm requires judicious placement of the closed-loop eigenvalues from the part of the designer, as well as a good understanding of the uncontrolled modal structural behavior. In this paper, the choice of location for the closed-loop eigenvalues is based upon the frequency content of the incoming earthquake signal, which is obtained in real time. A parallel spectrum analyzer performs real-time FFT to recognize the main earthquake frequencies. The desired new controlled system eigenfrequencies are chosen to be outside of the main frequency window, which includes the main frequencies of earthquake. Then, the new controlled system eigenvalues (poles) are defined, accounting for the relative uncontrolled damping ratios and the desired eigenfrequencies. The feedback matrix is estimated by pole placement algorithm, and the control demand (equivalent forces) is obtained via dynamic elastic analysis. The proposed approach is demonstrated by means of numerical examples, where a three and an eight-story building are analyzed. Conclusions regarding the optimum number of poles and their location with respect to the main frequency window of the incoming earthquake are drawn. © 2004 Taylor & Francis Group, London. |
en |
heal.journalName |
5th International PhD Symposium in Civil Engineering - Proceedings of the 5th International PhD Symposium in Civil Engineering |
en |
dc.identifier.volume |
2 |
en |
dc.identifier.spage |
1451 |
en |
dc.identifier.epage |
1460 |
en |