dc.contributor.author |
Vamvatsikos, D |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Aschheim, M |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Comartin, CD |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-03-01T02:52:51Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-03-01T02:52:51Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2011 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/36110 |
|
dc.relation.uri |
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-80054809752&partnerID=40&md5=5a4d6b605e8b8e5b6b2b6bc8503a00f4 |
en |
dc.subject |
Demand and capacity factored design |
en |
dc.subject |
Nonlinear dynamic analysis |
en |
dc.subject |
Perfor-mance assessment |
en |
dc.subject |
Performance-based earthquake engineering |
en |
dc.subject |
Uncertainty |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Demand and capacity factored design |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Non-linear dynamic analysis |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Perfor-mance assessment |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Performance-based earthquake engineering |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Uncertainty |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Civil engineering |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Computational methods |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Dynamic analysis |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Earthquake resistance |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Earthquakes |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Engineering geology |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Reinforced concrete |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Safety factor |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Seismic design |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Seismic waves |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Structural analysis |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Structural dynamics |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Uncertainty analysis |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Nonlinear analysis |
en |
dc.title |
A targeted nonlinear dynamic procedure to evaluate the seismic performance of structures |
en |
heal.type |
conferenceItem |
en |
heal.publicationDate |
2011 |
en |
heal.abstract |
The Targeted Nonlinear Dynamic Procedure is introduced to offer a practical evaluation of the seismic performance of structures. Building upon the SAC/FEMA closed-form probabilistic framework it can incorporate all important sources of variability and can be calibrated for conservatism. The hazard curve is combined with the nonlinear dynamic analysis performed for each limit-state using one or two levels of the intensity measure. This is either the elastic first-mode spectral acceleration or the more sufficient inelastic spectral displacement. From the suite of ground motion records only ""targeted"" subsets are used that are optimally selected to estimate the median and dispersion of the structural response. The simple factored demand and capacity checking format employed allows for a seamless integration with current engineering practice, while rational safety factors add the required degree of conservatism to account for epistemic uncertainties both for ductile and brittle modes of failure. Using a four-story reinforced concrete frame as an example, the proposed approach is shown to provide a relatively simple means to account for important sources of variability in nonlinear response history analysis. It offers powerful analysis options to a knowledgeable user in a format that can be upgraded incrementally and can provide an excellent introduction to sophisticated analysis techniques with more precisely controlled levels of conservatism. |
en |
heal.journalName |
ECCOMAS Thematic Conference - COMPDYN 2011: 3rd International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering: An IACM Special Interest Conference, Programme |
en |