dc.contributor.author |
Stathi, C |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Fragiadakis, M |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Papachristidis, A |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Papadrakakis, M |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-03-01T02:52:56Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-03-01T02:52:56Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2011 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/36158 |
|
dc.relation.uri |
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-80054813276&partnerID=40&md5=87cca2f2377128fd13f64d7d998a1d02 |
en |
dc.subject |
Fiber elements |
en |
dc.subject |
RC structures |
en |
dc.subject |
Shear deformations |
en |
dc.subject |
Shear walls |
en |
dc.subject |
Slender walls |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Beam elements |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Beam-columns |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Bending deformations |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Comparative assessment |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Computing demands |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Concrete shear wall |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Fiber elements |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Modeling approach |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Numerical studies |
en |
dc.subject.other |
RC structures |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Reinforced concrete member |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Shear failure |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Slender walls |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Timoshenko beams |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Timoshenko theory |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Civil engineering |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Computational methods |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Concrete buildings |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Earthquakes |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Engineering geology |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Failure modes |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Numerical methods |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Reinforced concrete |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Safety engineering |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Shear deformation |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Structural dynamics |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Shear walls |
en |
dc.title |
Comparative assessment on modeling approaches for the seismic response of RC shear walls |
en |
heal.type |
conferenceItem |
en |
heal.publicationDate |
2011 |
en |
heal.abstract |
Shear deformations may considerably affect the capacity and the failure mode of reinforced concrete members. Simplified beam-column models typically are not able to capture this effect and usually are suitable only for members that exhibit a flexure-dominated response. Modeling approaches of increasing complexity for the simulation of reinforced concrete shear walls are compared in this work. More specifically, we compare the common fiber beam element, a simplified fiber beam element based on the Timoshenko theory that considers separately shear and bending deformations and a third Timoshenko beam element where a multidimensional concrete law is used. The various approaches are discussed and compared against experimental results. It is worth noting that experiments implemented for the comparison exhibit different failure modes, flexural as well as shear failure. The numerical study provides an insight to the efficiency of the above methods in terms of computing demand, accuracy and ease of implementation. |
en |
heal.journalName |
ECCOMAS Thematic Conference - COMPDYN 2011: 3rd International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering: An IACM Special Interest Conference, Programme |
en |