Classifying event related potentials for valid and paradox reasoning

Zannos, S; Giannopoulos, F; Arabadjis, D; Rousopoulos, P; Papageorgiou, P; Koukoutsis, E; Papaodysseus, C; Papageorgiou, C

dc.contributor.author	Zannos, S	en
dc.contributor.author	Giannopoulos, F	en
dc.contributor.author	Arabadjis, D	en
dc.contributor.author	Rousopoulos, P	en
dc.contributor.author	Papageorgiou, P	en
dc.contributor.author	Koukoutsis, E	en
dc.contributor.author	Papaodysseus, C	en
dc.contributor.author	Papageorgiou, C	en
dc.date.accessioned	2014-03-01T02:53:34Z
dc.date.available	2014-03-01T02:53:34Z
dc.date.issued	2012	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/36422
dc.relation.uri	http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84861990485&partnerID=40&md5=105530e64723b3b5375b132c5d158b7b	en
dc.subject	Aristotle's reasoning	en
dc.subject	Curve fitting	en
dc.subject	Event related potentials (ERPs)	en
dc.subject	Paradox syllogism	en
dc.subject	Valid reasoning	en
dc.subject	Zeno's paradoxes	en
dc.subject.other	Aristotle's reasoning	en
dc.subject.other	Event related potentials	en
dc.subject.other	Paradox syllogism	en
dc.subject.other	Valid reasoning	en
dc.subject.other	Zeno's paradoxes	en
dc.subject.other	Curve fitting	en
dc.subject.other	Electrodes	en
dc.subject.other	Signal processing	en
dc.title	Classifying event related potentials for valid and paradox reasoning	en
heal.type	conferenceItem	en
heal.publicationDate	2012	en
heal.abstract	In this paper, a new methodology is presented for comparing the ERPs of Aristotle's ""valid reasoning"" and Zeno's ""paradoxes"". To achieve that, the ERPs of each such syllogism are grouped, by means of a new care-fitting approach. This consists of a) application of time-domain and amplitude scaling to one ERP and b) optimal fit of two ERPs via minimization of a properly defined error function. Next, the optimally fit ERPs, which form a group, are averaged to obtain an ideal representative for the valid and paradoxes reasoning separately. These ideal representatives manifest essential statistical differences per subject for a considerable number of electrodes (18 electrodes). The latter supports the assumption that the underlying mental processes of the valid and paradoxes reasoning are, indeed, different and this difference reflects upon the corresponding ERPs and, in particular, upon the introduced ideal representatives.	en
heal.journalName	BIOSIGNALS 2012 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Bio-Inspired Systems and Signal Processing	en
dc.identifier.spage	218	en
dc.identifier.epage	225	en