heal.abstract |
The dissertation provides theoretical and experimental support to the concept of
deliberately seismically under-designing shallow foundations to invoke strong below-ground
nonlinearity in the form of rocking, and thereby render RC structures safe under intense
seismic excitation. To this end,
(I) A series of small-scale (1-g) and centrifuge tests are conducted investigating the
performance of elastic single bridge pier models supported on shallow foundations of
different sizes. Static and seismic loading scenarios explore the potential benefits and
limitations of under-designed rocking foundations in comparison to conventional
alternatives.
(II) A validated nonlinear numerical method is developed to provide further insights on
the different shallow foundation response mechanisms with emphasis on soil failure. The
methodology of Anastasopoulos et al. [2010] is incorporated and extended to account for
scale effects in cohesionless soil.
(III) For a realistic modelling of the nonlinear response of the superstructure, the novel
small-scale physical model of Knappett et al [2011] is utilized and further developed to
fabricate 1:50 scaled replicas of well-confined modern RC bridge piers. A total of 26 such
piers were constructed. The validity of their response was verified by a number of 4-point
bending tests.
(IV) Four shaking table centrifuge tests investigate and compare the performance of two
RC model bridge piers, having the same structural section in each case, but with two
different foundation designs — a conventional design and a rocking isolation design. Each
alternative is tested under two different seismic loading scenarios, where the sequence of
real ground motions was imposed at the soil model base in such an order as to allow also
investigation of the effect of the exact seismic history.
(V) To improve rocking isolation design so as to avoid large foundation settlements, an
additional set of 9 centrifuge tests (4 static and 5 dynamic) are conducted involving several
hybrid foundation schemes. In these schemes the shallow rocking footing is suitably
“strengthened” by geometrical modifications or various means of soil improvement: (i) a
variable–geometry foundation, whose small rocking stiffness and capacity increase with
foundation rotation after some threshold angle; (ii) a rocking-isolated footing standing on
top of an appropriately designed “cofferdam”, which provokes uplifting by hindering the
formation of bearing capacity failure mechanisms under the footing; (iii) combined
densification with a 2 x 2 group of unconnected piles (one under each foundation corner);
and (iv) a grid of micro-pile inclusions.
The results demonstrate the virtues of rocking-isolation shallow foundations, which stem
from: (i) reducing accelerations transmitted onto the deck; (ii) increasing system ductility;
(iii) limiting permanent deck drifts; and (iv) increasing resistance against damage
accumulation in successive earthquakes. Yet, these tests also highlight the main drawback of
rocking isolation. That is, the so called “sinking response”, or in other words the gradual
accumulation of settlement caused by strongly inelastic soil behaviour. The four new
concepts for improving the performance of rocking foundations that were introduced and
tested in this dissertation prove capable of ameliorating this drawback while retaining the
benefits of rocking isolation. |
en |