Seismic assessment, retrofit & monetary loss analysis of a 4-storey reinforced concrete building constructed in 1995, in Aridaia

Mantsis, Thanasis; Μάντσης, Θανάσης

dc.contributor.author	Mantsis, Thanasis	en
dc.contributor.author	Μάντσης, Θανάσης	el
dc.date.accessioned	2024-02-26T09:32:13Z
dc.date.available	2024-02-26T09:32:13Z
dc.identifier.uri	https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/58949
dc.identifier.uri	http://dx.doi.org/10.26240/heal.ntua.26645
dc.description	Εθνικό Μετσόβιο Πολυτεχνείο--Μεταπτυχιακή Εργασία. Διεπιστημονικό-Διατμηματικό Πρόγραμμα Μεταπτυχιακών Σπουδών (Δ.Π.Μ.Σ.) “Δομοστατικός Σχεδιασμός και Ανάλυση των Κατασκευών”	el
dc.rights	Αναφορά Δημιουργού-Μη Εμπορική Χρήση-Όχι Παράγωγα Έργα 3.0 Ελλάδα	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/gr/	*
dc.subject	Seismic assessment	en
dc.subject	Monetary loss analysis	en
dc.subject	Retrofit	en
dc.subject	KAN.EPE	en
dc.subject	EC8-Part 3	en
dc.title	Seismic assessment, retrofit & monetary loss analysis of a 4-storey reinforced concrete building constructed in 1995, in Aridaia	en
dc.title	Σεισμική αποτίμηση, ενίσχυση και ανάλυση χρηματικών απωλειών τετραώροφου κτιρίου από οπλισμένο σκυρόδεμα κατασκευής 1995, στην Αριδαία	el
heal.type	masterThesis
heal.classification	Seismic assessment	en
heal.classification	Σεισμική αποτίμηση	el
heal.language	en
heal.access	campus
heal.recordProvider	ntua	el
heal.publicationDate	2023-10-26
heal.abstract	Greece is an earthquake prone country with a significantly large percentage of old buildings that were designed according to superseded antiseismic codes that applied at the time of construction, if any, therefore their seismic assessment is of significant importance. As a case study, the assessment of a reinforced concrete residential building, which was constructed in 1995 in Aridaia Greece, is considered. The seismic assessment is conducted at three levels of progressively increasing detail in their approach, calculation demands, and therefore result accuracy. Initially, the 1st level seismic assessment method (rapid visual screening) is performed upon which the priority for further assessment is evaluated. Regarding the 2nd level assessment, two separate analytical methods are applied, introduced by Dritsos S. and Vougioukas E. The former estimates the base shear resistance of the structure using a combination of quantitative calculations and qualitative indices, whereas the latter estimates the base shear resistance using only calculations based on the provisions of Greek Regulation for Interventions (KAN.EPE). Finally, two tertiary assessment methods are conducted, following the provisions of KAN.EPE and Eurocode 8 – Part 3, through numerical modeling and inelastic (pushover) static analyses. Based on the results derived, retrofit scenarios are examined in order to improve the performance of the building and ensure compliance with the current provisions that apply. Finally, a monetary loss analysis is conducted for the building, as is. First, the SPO2FRAG software is utilized in order to derive the building’s fragility curves by incorporating the results derived from the tertiary assessment, whilst avoiding dynamic analyses. Subsequently, the FEMA-58 PACT software is utilized to calculate and assess potential repair cost associated with the structural and non-structural component damages.	en
heal.advisorName	Vamvatsikos, Dimitrios	en
heal.advisorName	Βαμβάτσικος, Δημήτριος	el
heal.committeeMemberName	Gantes, Charalampos	en
heal.committeeMemberName	Thanopoulos, Pavlos	en
heal.academicPublisher	Εθνικό Μετσόβιο Πολυτεχνείο. Σχολή Πολιτικών Μηχανικών	el
heal.academicPublisherID	ntua
heal.numberOfPages	98 σ.	el
heal.fullTextAvailability	false