dc.contributor.author |
Kanellakis, PC |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Papadimitriou, CH |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-03-01T01:06:16Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-03-01T01:06:16Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
1984 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0022-0000 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/9284 |
|
dc.relation.uri |
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0021376085&partnerID=40&md5=dfc1b438446c06f942a39224b07d5280 |
en |
dc.subject.classification |
Computer Science, Hardware & Architecture |
en |
dc.subject.classification |
Computer Science, Theory & Methods |
en |
dc.subject.other |
DATABASE SYSTEMS |
en |
dc.title |
Is distributed locking harder? |
en |
heal.type |
journalArticle |
en |
heal.language |
English |
en |
heal.publicationDate |
1984 |
en |
heal.abstract |
The problem of determining whether a set of locked transactions, accessing a distributed database, is guaranteed to produce only serializable schedules is examined. For a pair of transactions, with n steps, it is proved that this concurrency control problem, which is polynomially solvable for centralized databases, is in general coNP-complete. A new graphtheoretic technique is employed and an O(n2) test for the special case of databases distributed between two sites is provided. © 1984. |
en |
heal.publisher |
ACADEMIC PRESS INC JNL-COMP SUBSCRIPTIONS |
en |
heal.journalName |
Journal of Computer and System Sciences |
en |
dc.identifier.isi |
ISI:A1984SH96800006 |
en |
dc.identifier.volume |
28 |
en |
dc.identifier.issue |
1 |
en |
dc.identifier.spage |
103 |
en |
dc.identifier.epage |
120 |
en |