The content and meaning of the transition from the theory of relations in philosophy of arithmetic to the mereology of the third logical investigation

Vassiliou, F

dc.contributor.author	Vassiliou, F	en
dc.date.accessioned	2014-03-01T11:45:10Z
dc.date.available	2014-03-01T11:45:10Z
dc.date.issued	2010	en
dc.identifier.issn	0085-5553	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/37260
dc.subject	foundation	en
dc.subject	fusion	en
dc.subject	Husserl	en
dc.subject	mereology	en
dc.subject	part	en
dc.subject	whole	en
dc.subject.classification	Philosophy	en
dc.title	The content and meaning of the transition from the theory of relations in philosophy of arithmetic to the mereology of the third logical investigation	en
heal.type	other	en
heal.identifier.primary	10.1163/156916410X524475	en
heal.identifier.secondary	http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156916410X524475	en
heal.language	English	en
heal.publicationDate	2010	en
heal.abstract	In the third Logical Investigation Husserl presents an integrated theory of wholes and parts based on the notions of dependency, foundation (Fundierung), and aprioricity. Careful examination of the literature reveals misconceptions regarding the meaning and scope of the central axis of this theory, especially with respect to its proper context within the development of Husserl's thought. The present paper will establish this context and in the process correct a number of these misconceptions. The presentation of mereology in the Logical Investigations will be shown to originate largely from Husserl's implicit self-criticism of his prior views on the unity of a whole presented in his first work, Philosophy of Arithmetic. © 2010 Brill.	en
heal.publisher	HUMANITIES PRESS INC	en
heal.journalName	Research in Phenomenology	en
dc.identifier.doi	10.1163/156916410X524475	en
dc.identifier.isi	ISI:000284341100006	en
dc.identifier.volume	40	en
dc.identifier.issue	3	en
dc.identifier.spage	408	en
dc.identifier.epage	429	en